We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

The Disinformation Governance Board was disbanded in 2022 after public concern over its ‘potential for censorship.’

The former disinformation chief of the Biden administration’s short-lived information-vetting program has joined a nonprofit organization that attacks Republicans for questioning the credibility of appointed disinformation gatekeepers.

Nina Jankowicz, the former head of the Department of Homeland Security’s disbanded Disinformation Governance Board (DGB), which was shut down in August 2022 amid controversy over its potential weaponization, is now the executive officer and co-founder of the American Sunlight Project (ASP).

The ASP’s stated mission is to “expose deceptive information practices,” “educate the public about the threats,” and “engage with policymakers to return truth to our national discourse,” according to its website.

In a letter on behalf of the ASP to committee and subcommittee chairmen Reps. Jim Jordan (R–Ohio), Dan Bishop (R-N.C.), and James Comer (R-Ky.), Ms. Jankowicz criticized the conservative congressman for what she said was using government resources to go after “independent technology researchers” and “misconstrue their work.”

“The Weaponization Subcommittee has selectively released congressional testimony to discredit [the researchers], make them targets for harassment, and create a chilling effect across the field of disinformation research,” Ms. Jankowicz said.

In the letter, she stated that the country is under attack by entities such as China and Russia attempting to “pollute the information department” through AI-generated deepfake strategies and online disinformation tactics to influence public opinion.

Related Stories

Jim Jordan Subpoenas Former ‘Disinformation Governance Board’ Head, Nina Jankowicz

11/28/2022

Former White House ‘Disinformation Czar’ Nina Jankowicz Registers as Foreign Agent

“These are real, present-day threats to American democracy that are being generated both by our foreign adversaries and actors inside the U.S., and they will only intensify as our regulations, law enforcement, and norms struggle to keep up with technological advances,” she said.

Instead of resolving to fight these threats, government agencies have taken a step back while social media companies have reversed moderation policies in fear of “potential political retribution,” she noted.

Pointing to the Weaponization of the Federal Government and the Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability subcommittees, she said, “This halt in activity can be attributed in part to the targeted attacks of your committees, which have falsely alleged that any study of, or communication about, information amounts to what you have dubbed as ‘censorship.’”

She accused committee members of specifically targeting women, who consequently “have faced gendered, sexualized, violent rhetoric as a result of your actions.”

The subcommittees’ investigations have been based on “cherry-picked evidence” that “distorts the truth,” while giving a platform to “baseless conspiracy theories.”

She called on the subcommittees to “release all unedited transcripts and video recordings” related to their investigations.

“We believe this behavior is a weaponization of the legislative branch and its power,” she said. “In the leadup to the 2024 election, Americans should recognize any selective releases from your committees for what they are: Political ploys meant to intimidate experts from discussing their research and analysis.”

‘Twitter Files’

In 2023, the Republican-majority House voted to create the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, chaired by Mr. Jordan, after the 2022 release of a 1,000-page report detailing whistleblower testimony about alleged politicization of the Department of Justice and the FBI.

One of the subcommittee’s most significant investigations was into the “Twitter Files,” which highlighted how certain elements in the federal government colluded with Big Tech companies like Twitter, YouTube, and Meta to censor information that didn’t track with the government’s preferred narrative when it came to COVID-19 policies such as mask mandates, lockdowns, and vaccine mandates, in addition to questions about election integrity.

In 2022, Louisiana’s then-Attorney General (now governor) Jeff Landry, along with Missouri’s then-Attorney General (now senator) Eric Schmitt, filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration. They alleged exactly what the Twitter Files later exposed: an attempt by the federal government to act as a gatekeeper of information on social media, thereby controlling the dominant narrative in public discourse.

During this time, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas set up the DGB in April 2022 with Ms. Jankowitz at its helm to “counter misinformation related to homeland security, focused specifically on irregular migration and Russia.”

In August 2022, the DGB was disbanded after public concern over its “potential for censorship.”

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) argued that the board could be used as a way to control speech.

“This new board is almost certainly unconstitutional,” he said at the time. “It can only be assumed that the sole purpose of this new Disinformation Governance Board will be to marshal the power of the federal government to censor conservative and dissenting speech.”

‘Informational Harms’

In an interview with CNN on launching ASP, Ms. Jankowicz said the group’s intent is to protect democracy at a time when political polarization in the United States makes the country an easy target for foreign adversaries.

“In the meantime, disinformation researchers, people who are working on those threats—the canaries in the coal mine—they’re being snuffed out by our very own members of Congress,” she said. “There’s a dereliction of duty going on, basically.”

She disagreed with the way DHS implemented the DGB, during which time she said she received death threats.

With the ASP, she said there will be more transparency.

When asked about the difference between a government agency launching a disinformation regulation agency and a nonprofit doing so, she responded by first stating that the DGB was “widely lied about” when it was characterized as a “ministry of truth” in which she would decide what is true or false online.

“It was about coordinating best practices within the department,” she added.  The ASP’s goal is different, she said.

“We’re still bringing people together. We’re coordinating, but we’re shining a light on the informational harms that have infected our informational ecosystem right now.”

The Epoch Times reached out to the subcommittees for comment.

Katabella Roberts and Mimi Nguyen Ly contributed to this report.