We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

Hunter Biden has lost in federal court today on his request to dismiss his felony tax charges, which means his trial on this will be coming this summer.

The judge was so unimpressed with the argument of Hunter’s lawyers that he said “The motion is remarkable in that it fails to include a single declaration, exhibit, or request for judicial notice. Instead, Defendant cites portions of various Internet news sources, social media posts, and legal blogs. These citations, however, are not evidence.”

Here’s more from CNN:

A federal judge has denied Hunter Biden’s attempts to throw out his felony tax indictment, paving the way for a trial in June.

The judge, who was skeptical of Hunter Biden’s arguments at a hearing last week in Los Angeles, rejected eight motions to dismiss in a sweeping 82-page ruling issued Monday.

President Joe Biden’s son has pleaded not guilty to all nine charges. He is accused of repeatedly failing to file and pay his taxes on time and engaging in an illegal tax-evasion scheme by filing false tax returns and cooking the books on his company’s payroll.

In a victory for special counsel David Weiss, US District Judge Mark Scarsi rejected Hunter Biden’s arguments that the felony indictment was politically motivated.

Scarsi said that Hunter Biden’s lawyers provided “virtually no evidence” to back their theory that Weiss’ team exhibited anti-Biden bias, and that a “rigorous standard” must be met before an indictment can be thrown out on these grounds.

The judge blasted Hunter Biden’s lawyers for relying on a hodgepodge of news articles and social media posts to push the theory that Weiss brought the charges because he caved to pressure from former President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans — which Weiss’ prosecutors have called a “conspiracy theory.”

“The motion is remarkable in that it fails to include a single declaration, exhibit, or request for judicial notice,” the judge wrote. “Instead, Defendant cites portions of various Internet news sources, social media posts, and legal blogs. These citations, however, are not evidence.”

Scarsi also roundly rejected Hunter Biden’s assertion that Weiss was improperly appointed special counsel, writing that Hunter Biden’s attorneys offered “no convincing reason” as to why he shouldn’t have been appointed.