We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

For the climate cult, scary charts like Michael Mann’s dodgy “hockey stick” haven’t done the trick of scaring everyone into bug-eating submission. So they come up with stylistic depictions like these to overcome their “communications problem” (which is the all-purpose excuse for our resistance to bug eating—that there might be defects in their case is simply never admitted):

Oh, I’m sure you’re convinced now! How can you ignore the compelling logic of flow-charts like these?

Of course, two can play at this game. Much of the climate con relies on the “consensus” of “peer-reviewed” science. Steve Stewart-Williams calls our attention to a paper he co-authored along with a couple dozen others and published by PNAS on scientific censorship. And the paper offers this chart that accurately reflects what goes on in climate science: