Russia’s Su-35 Fighter: Could It Defeat an F-22 Raptor in Combat?

We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

Key Points: The Russian Su-35 is an advanced 4th-generation ++++ fighter derived from the Su-27 platform. It boasts impressive attributes, including Mach 2.35 speeds, “supercruise” capability, and enhanced thrust-to-weight ratios rivaling the F-22 Raptor.

-Its semi-stealthy design, avionics, and thrust vectoring contribute to its air combat capabilities, though it lacks the comprehensive stealth of 5th-generation aircraft.

-While its advanced radar, weaponry, and maneuverability make it a formidable adversary, the F-22’s superior sensors, weapons, and manned-unmanned teaming likely maintain its dominance.

-The Su-35 underscores Russia’s push to remain competitive in air superiority but struggles to fully rival modern Western airpower systems.

F-22 vs. Su-35: Who Wins in an Air Combat Showdown?

As a derivative of the 1980s era Su-27, the upgraded Russian Su-35 may not be fully understood as being the threat that it may actually be, given the scope and impact of the adjustments and upgrades built into the aircraft. The Russian Su-35 aircraft is indeed a very capable aircraft, despite largely being a modern variant of the Su-27, for a number of key reasons. Not only is the Su-27 itself a high-speed, effective aircraft but the newer Su-35 variant of the aircraft could be called a 4th-generation ++++ (plus) due to the upgrades woven in. First of all, the aircraft is fast, as even the Su-27 can hit speeds of Mach 2.35, and the Su-35 is just as fast but also operates with an F-22-like “supercruise” ability to sustain speeds without needing afterburner. 

Given this, and several other critical attributes of the Su-35, the question then becomes .. was it built to rival and challenge the F-22? The idea makes sense, because although the Su-35 may generally be regarded as a 4th-generation aircraft, it does possess a number of performance parameters and technology upgrades which might make it a formidable challenge to the largely unparalleled US Air Force F-22.  This being said, the US Air Force and Lockheed have been quite diligent when it comes to upgrading the F-22 to ensure it retains its superiority. So — ultimately, which aircraft would prevail in an air war? 

An interesting and potentially lesser-recognized factor is that the Su-35, while of course not a fully stealth aircraft, does appear to have some radar-cross-section reducing attributes. Simply to the observers eye, the Su-35 does look a little stealthy, as it has a slightly more rounded fuselage that most more sharply-edged 4th-generation aircraft.  A blended wing-body presents fewer sharp contours and angles likely to generate a return rendering to enemy radar when electromagnetic “pings” bounce off the aircraft.  Looking closely at the fuselage, the Su-35 does seem to slightly resemble the F-22, yet that by no means indicates its stealth properties are comparable. The Su-35 did, however, arrive as recently at 2014, a timeframe suggesting that the aircraft may indeed incorporate a large number of more cutting-edge upgrades in the realm of weaponry, sensing, avionics, mission systems and non-kinetic weapons such as EW.   Also, a Russian-language newspaper called Hoboctn BNK claims the Su-35 has an F-22-like “supercruise” ability to maintain Mach-speeds without needing an afterburner. However, perhaps the most striking area of comparison lies in its thrust to weight ratio, which appears to be “higher” than or at least “close to” an F-22.   A data chart published in the Russia Defence Forum indicates that the Su-35 tops the chart with a 1.30 thrust-to-weight ratio, whereas the F-22 is listed as 1.18 or as high as 1.37 with round nozzles, according to the chart from the source.  However, despite this apparent small deficit, the chart is also clear that an F-22 can reach a thrust-to-weight radio of 1.37 with round nozzles. 

All of this raises the large and critical question as to which aircraft would prevail in air-to-air combat. Many regard the F-22 as the best air-supremacy fighter anywhere in the world, a claim which may well be true.  While much of an outcome in a dogfight may pertain to pilot ability and decision-making, some might wonder if technical aspects of either plane might give it an advantage. The planes appear closely if not somewhat comparable in terms of speed and thrust to weight ratio, therefore it is likely other variables might determine the margin of difference between the two aircraft.  The pressing question, of course, is which aircraft and pilot would complete the famous OODA loop first? John’s Boyd’s famous fighter pilot air-war paradigm articulated the idea that whichever aircraft is ahead of or inside of the other’s decision making cycle is likely to prevail.  OODA refers to Observe, Orient, Decide, Act, indicating that the pilot and aircraft which perceives the dynamics and adjusts to circumstances faster and more accurately would be in a position to “decide” and “act” or kill and destroy first.  After all the F-22 if often referred to as a “first-shot, first-kill” aircraft.  

Therefore, given that both aircraft can take-off vertically and achieve high levels of thrust, vectoring and rate of climb .. the real technical difference in terms of performance parameters likely resides in the quality of mission systems, weapons targeting, sensing and computing. Such a question raises the key premise as to whether the entire concept of dogfighting may be becoming obsolete. This is, to some degree, the premise of the F-35, because although it is built to dogfight with great effectiveness, its computing, targeting, radar and sensing may be so capable that it simply does not “have” to dogfight to prevail in air war. This appears quite true with the F-35, particularly when it comes to engaging 4th-generation aircraft. In critical US Air Force wargames such as Red Flag, for example, the F-35 has shown it can “see” and “destroy” large numbers of 4th-generation aircraft from distances where it is not detected by an enemy fighter. Naturally, this provides an unparalleled advantage and offers itself as an example of the areas of technological difference likely to determine the winner in an F-22 to Su-35 engagement.  

It is perhaps with this in mind that the Air Force and Lockheed have been quite diligent when it comes to upgrading the F-22 in recent years. Not only has the F-22 been upgraded with avionics, sensing and communications technology to enable it to operate as a “aerial quarterback,” but software upgrades have massively improved its weapons capacity.  Several years ago, a fleet-wide F-22 upgrade referred to as 3.2b greatly improved the range, targeting precision and guidance technologies of both the AIM-9X Sidewinder and AIM-120D. Each of these known air-to-air weapons were upgraded in a way that substantially improves performance and lethality.  The upgrades to the F-22 weapons also likely included “hardening” technologies, meaning methods of ensuring the RF and infrared guidance systems can continue on to a target despite enemy “jamming” efforts. 

Lockheed and the Air Force have also reinforced, preserved and improved the “coating” of the F-22, a development which may have involved improving or at least maintaining its radar-absorbent materials.  There have also been substantial communications breakthroughs when it comes to the F-22, as new data links now enable two-way connectivity between F-22s and the F-35 and 4th-generation aircraft as well. 

Finally, one critical area of potential fighter jet air superiority likely lies in the realm of manned-unmanned teaming. For years Air Force scientists and weapons developers have made progress developing the F-22s ability to control drones from the cockpit. This of course extends sensing, targeting range and even attack possibilities and it is something the US Air Force has evolved to a substantial degree. Write ups in Russia’s TASS news agency indicate that Russia is indeed working to replicate this kind of capability, yet a reading of their news reports seems to indicate that the Russian military is not quite as advanced as the US Air Force when it comes to the realm of manned-unmanned teaming. The US Air Force, for example, has already shown it can connect unmanned aircraft with F-35 fighter jets while “in-flight,” a step suggesting the ability for manned jets to control groups of drones from the air is fast approaching if not already here. This enables a 5th-gen aircraft to blanket an area with surveillance, test enemy air defenses, perform forward high-risk reconnaissance and even deliver weapons when directed by a human. The victorious aircraft in a combat engagement between an F-22 and Su-35 may be the fighter best able to operate unmanned systems from the air. 

What all of this suggests is that, regardless of whichever aircraft might prevail in a dogfight, the fighter jet with superior sensors, weapons and targeting may be best positioned to prevail. This leaves many unknowns, as the full extent of the Su-35’s stealth properties, computing and weapons guidance may not be easy to discern, yet the fact remains that the Su-35 may indeed present a larger threat than is generally recognized. 

Russian media has also discussed upgraded “guided missiles” for its Su-35 and Su-57 which could be quite significant, as an air-to-air or air-to-ground weapon is only as effective as its sensing and targeting allows. Should a Russian 5th-generation Su-57 or 4th-generation “plus” upgraded Su-35 be upgraded with guided weapons able to maintain an precise targeting trajectory from superior stand-off ranges, then it might operate with an advantage. Details regarding what kinds of weapons upgrades will be demonstrated on the Russian fighter jets were not available, however the TASS media report raises the critical question of how weapons upgrades on the Su-35 or Su-57 compare with enhanced weapons systems built into the F-22 and F-35. The jet which detects identities and is able to “hit” the other from safer stand-off ranges is clearly the one with an advantage likely to prevail in air combat.

Su-27

Russia’s large fleet of Su-27 ‘Flanker’ fighter jets continues to have a substantial and lasting impact on the country’s Air Force because of its bomb-carrying capacity and influence upon subsequent Su-27-influenced variants such as the Su-30 and Su-35.

The 1980s-era Su-27 has evolved into a number of critical variants including the Su-34 fighter-bomber and 4th-Gen ++ Su-35, among others. The aircraft has been in service for many years and available specs state it operates at high speeds of Mach 2.3 and with an impressive thrust-to-weight ratio of 1.09.

The Su-27 can also function in a “bomb truck” capacity as it operates with 10 hardpoints and is, not surprisingly, comparable in many respects to the MiG-29 fighter introduced just a few years prior.

While the jet clearly is not “stealthy” in the modern sense of the term, the Su-27 does seem to resemble some radar signature-lowering features such as a rounded nose, blended or nearly horizontal wing-body structure, and F-22-like dual-engine integration into the fuselage.

Fewer sharp, angled, or “protruding” hard edges certainly generate a much smaller radar return signature as electromagnetic “pings” have fewer shapes off of which to bounce and deliver a rendering. In terms of body configuration, both the Su-27 and its Su-35 successor have an F-22-like fuselage.

Su-27s & Su-35s

Russia’s fleet of 1985-era Su-27s is quite large and listed at 359 aircraft, according to a Russian publication listed as The Center for Analysis of World Arms Trade.

The largest influence of the Su-27 appears not only to be its large fleet size but the impact upon its high-risk follow-on variants such as the Su-35 and now emerging Su-35S. Russia operates upgraded 4th-generation Su-35 aircraft as well as Su-30s. 

Both the Su-34s and Su-35s are cited as “fighter aircraft” emerging as recently as 2014. The Su-34 is listed as a “fighter-bomber” with long-range strike capacity and the Su-35 is reported to be a multi-role heavy combat fighter.

The Russian Su-35 could almost be viewed as a quasi-stealthy hybrid mix of advanced fourth-generation fighter jet technology and the early boundaries of what is called 5th-generation

While available specs say Russia operates 110 Su-35s, a number which is certainly substantial, it is unclear just how many of them have already been upgraded with the Su-35 ++ variants.

Should Russia have large numbers of upgraded Su-35s, their inability to achieve air superiority remains even more mysterious, especially given the sheer number of 4th-generation fighters reported to be part of Russia’s air fleet.

The Su-35 configuration includes a blended wing-body configuration and horizontal fuselage, which makes it look stealthier than an F-18 Super Hornet with an almost F-22-like rounded wing-body and dual exhaust. The Russian Su-35 configuration looks stealthy enough to have potentially inspired designs for the emerging Russian Su-57, a 5th-generation stealth aircraft.

Russia’s TASS news agency describes the “heavily upgraded” Su-35S as a maneuverable, multi-purpose fighter jet developed on the “basis of 5th-generation technologies.” The “++” refers to new avionics, communications, radar technology, and what the paper calls “plasma ignition engines” to increase thrust vectoring. Much like a 5th-generation jet, the additional thrust vectoring technology enables the Su-35 to achieve supersonic speed without using an afterburner, the paper claims.

This is quite significant as it can of course perform high-speed maneuvers and also support longer “dwell time” and attack mission duration in high-threat environments.

About the Author: Kris Osborn

Kris Osborn is President of Warrior Maven – Center for Military Modernization. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a Highly Qualified Expert with the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University.