We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.
Thanks to a new Biden-Harris administration rule, airlines are hereby mandated to automatically refund flights that are significantly delayed or canceled if the consumer rejects any alternative accommodation.
Announced on Wednesday by Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, the rule is reportedly meant to incentivize airlines to avoid/minimize significant disruptions like extended delays or cancellations.
“When an airline knows that all — instead of just a few of the passengers on a canceled flight — are likely to actually get their money back, it gives them a different set of reasons to put in the investment, and the realistic scheduling that makes those cancellations less likely to happen to begin with,” Buttigieg said in a statement.
Passengers deserve to get their money back when an airline owes them—without headaches or haggling. Today, our automatic refund rule goes into full effect. Airlines are required to provide prompt cash refunds without passengers having to ask. pic.twitter.com/otIvRaGJxC
— Secretary Pete Buttigieg (@SecretaryPete) October 28, 2024
According to CBS News, the new rule contains a universal definition of what a “significant change” to a flight means. Previously, the definition of “significant change” differed based on the airline.
“A significant change to a flight now includes a three-hour or longer delay for domestic flights, and at least a six-hour delay on international flights,” CBS News notes. “If an airline changes a flight’s departure or arrival airport, or adds a connection, that also counts.”
The new rule also boasts a bunch of other goodies for travelers. For example, travelers are entitled to a refund if their checked luggage doesn’t arrive at their final destination within a reasonable amount of time (12 hours for a domestic flight, and 15-30 hours for an international flight). The only catch here is travelers must first file a mishandled baggage report.
Travelers are also entitled to a partial refund if an extra service they paid for — including Wi-Fi, seat selection, or entertainment — isn’t available for some reason.
The most important aspect of the rule, according to a DOT press release, is that it “makes it simple and straightforward for passengers to receive the money they are owed.”
‘”Without this rule, consumers have to navigate a patchwork of cumbersome processes to request and receive a refund — searching through airline websites to figure out how to make the request, filling out extra ‘digital paperwork,’ or at times waiting for hours on the phone,” the press release reads.
“In addition, passengers would receive a travel credit or voucher by default from some airlines instead of getting their money back, so they could not use their refund to rebook on another airline when their flight was changed or canceled without navigating a cumbersome request process,” it continues.
Responding to the new rule, social media users were divided. Some criticized the new rule, arguing that it’ll just lead to higher prices and won’t resolve travelers’ immediate needs.
Look:
Get ready for new flight cancelation fees and change fees and additional small taxes and fees.
— Johnny Corvette (@JohnnyCorvette) October 29, 2024
This regulation is a bit much. I sense we’ll see dire consequences in the coming years
— Daniel Diaz — e/acc (@Dannydiaz041) October 30, 2024
I mean most people don’t want an instant refund though . They want a new ticket asap to get where they’re headed.
— Amy Anderz (@Cryptocockatooo) October 30, 2024
The real issue is not getting refunds but getting to where you need to go.
It doesn’t help when you are stranded at an airport.
This ruling helps a small percent of travelers.— jonjohnoc (@jonjohnoc) October 29, 2024
So dumb, like every other time “brilliant” politicians have attempted to corral the airlines while pandering.
“Hey , your flight is cancelled. Here’s $300. Good luck finding another flight for under $800….”
— Toecutta (@Toecutta1) October 30, 2024
But many others praised the new rule, arguing it’s an example — albeit a rare one — of Buttigieg actually getting the job done.
The Transportation Secretary has previously faced criticism for being AWOL, namely when he quietly took time off from work for so-called “paternity leave” without telling anybody right after he and his gay spouse adopted two newborns.
Buttigieg took the “paternity leave” amid the infamous 2021 supply chain crisis. He claimed for his part that he was in contact with the administration the whole time and still handling his job while on leave.
Republicans for their part didn’t believe him:
Pete Buttigieg was completely unqualified to serve as Secretary of Transportation. But Biden still picked him.
Now, Pete is absent during a transportation crisis that is hurting working-class Americans.
— Tom Cotton (@TomCottonAR) October 11, 2021
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.