We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

Fox News host Sean Hannity and ESPN host Stephen A. Smith got into a sparring match Thursday over the ongoing presidential election.

Hannity argued from the get-go that Vice President Kamala Harris is unable to articulate a coherent thought because she’s desperately trying to run away from her ultra-radical past.

Listen:

(Video Credit: Fox News)

“I argue to you that the reason she’s struggling and … tied up like a pretzel [is] because she can’t express what she has stated publicly that she wants the Green New Deal, the elimination of the filibuster,” Hannity began. “She can’t say that she wants to eliminate private health insurance, as she has said in the past.”

“She’s not going to run on what she’s stated in the past to decriminalize illegal immigration, free food, housing, healthcare, education, sex change operations, and a path to citizenship. Or banning fracking, banning offshore drilling. So she has to give us word salads because she won’t tell us how she really feels. She’s hiding her true beliefs. Donald Trump doesn’t do that,” he added.

He was right. As previously documented numerous times by BizPac Review, Harris is patently incapable of articulating a thought without descending into a ridiculous and meaningless word salad.

Former President Donald Trump meanwhile generally articulates himself just fine, mainly because he has nothing to hide. Just for the record, he’s also participated in far more media events than Harris.

Yet Smith, a die-hard leftist, disagreed. First, he defended Harris by claiming “it wasn’t her job to lead” as vice president …

“Bottom line is this, as vice president of the United States, it wasn’t her job to lead,” he said. “She had to go along with the program. You are the support base. You support the person who’s in charge, who happened to be Joe Biden.”

It’s not clear what this had to do with her running away from her past positions.

Smith continued by claiming Trump is the inarticulate one.

“I know you aren’t talking about somebody being lucid and cogent and enunciating their thoughts with clarity and you are bragging about Donald Trump,” he said. “We can’t be watching the same stuff if that’s what you are doing.”

“Oh, I am,” Hannity confidently replied.

“You are going to do that today?” Smith then asked. “Senator Lindsey Graham is about to come on the show. That man can articulate himself. Not Donald Trump now.”

“I have sat with him for hour after hour after hour, topic after topic after topic, and he is so dialed in,” Hannity responded.

“Really?” Smith asked in disbelief.

REALLY!

Slightly switching directions, Hannity then brought up how the entire Democrat Party had spent months (and years, really) ignoring and denying President Joe Biden’s obvious cognitive decline.

“Meanwhile, your friends in the Democrat Party, they ignored the obvious, significant, deep cognitive decline of the president for over four years,” he said. “I said it before the 2020 election.”

“Kamala to this day says, ‘Oh, Joe was really cognitively alert.’ You know that’s a crock. I know that’s a crock. Everybody in Washington knows it’s a crock,” he added.

This prompted Smith to seriously ask, “What is she supposed to say?”

“The truth!” Hannity barked back.

“No, you don’t do that,” Smith replied. “You don’t dime out your boss. I do tell the truth on my show. What I said, however, is I’m not going to dime out my boss if it’s my boss.”

“She knew he was a cognitive mess, and now she’s lying — oh, no, I never noticed it,” Hannity responded, doubling down on his accusation.

“Are you sure you want to make the case about somebody lying? Are you sure about that?” Smith shot back.

Hannity then gave Smith the final word.

“The question is, will it be for better or will it be for worse [if Trump wins]?” he said. “The cesspool that we look at as the nation’s capital, if you got him back in office and he’s only on a revenge tour and he’s not focused on doing what it takes to lead the country. Where will that lead the country? You are not bringing that part up.”

“So again we might not like something on the left, we might not like something on the right, these are the two candidates we’ve got to work with and when you bring up issues in terms of character or in terms of being truthful or whatever, let me tell you something right now, you can bring a whole bunch of Republicans and I would be cool with it, you can’t bring up Trump to make a case against somebody else using those arguments. You can’t do that,” he added.

Vivek Saxena
Latest posts by Vivek Saxena (see all)

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.