"It doesn't pass a smell test:" CNN contributor takes a

We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

Subscribe to Louder with Crowder on Rumble! Download the app on Apple and Google Play.

There’s less than two weeks until election day and Kamala is doing very poorly in the polls. Subsequently, get ready for a wave of unethical journalism that becomes more unhinged by the day.

In this specific incident, the media has resorted to something that never happened four years ago. This does not “pass the smell test,” which is why CNN panelist Ryan James Girdusky slammed The Atlantic hit piece on Trump claiming he had a conversation he likely never had.

Mayra Guillen, the sister of the late Vanessa Guillen, dismissed a hit piece in the Atlantic alleging Trump disrespected her ethnicity and refused to pay for her funeral.

Mayra was so baffled by this blatant politicization of her sister’s death by the media, slamming it as “hurtful” and “disrespectful.”

According to the Real Clear Politics

GIRDUSKY: According to the Jeffrey Goldberg article, which we talked about this entire night, you can’t trust that article. Because the quote, “$60,000 for an effing Mexican funeral,” the only two on record sources both said that he didn’t say that. The only source is an anonymous source, and the family of the deceased soldier said that he was lovely to them and in fact they voted for Donald Trump today. That’s how much they disagreed and they said it was a disrespectful article that politicized the death of their loved one.

And Jeffrey Goldberg did not care about printing something that they had no sources on the record for. And I honest to God, like most Americans, do not care about General Kelly’s farewell tour where he tries to make amends for working for Donald Trump since Democrats said we’re going to run all these Republicans who work for Trump out of town unless they somehow make peace.

So two weeks before election day, he ran to liberal journalist Susan Glasser about a conversation that allegedly happened four years ago. It doesn’t pass a smell test. And that is why people are turned off to all of these stories. They remember Donald Trump’s presidency for low inflation, jobs, peace through strength, controlled borders. That’s why they care.

No one believes Jeffrey Goldberg and the article from a publication that’s owned by one of the Harris’s donors.

It’s unclear how the outlet decided to jump on something from four years after the fact it never happened, but the least these ethical “journalists” could have done was not politically weaponize a tragic death but never underestimate the lows these people resort to.

Additionally, not only is it obvious it never happened but it’s not even a good fabrication. However, these stories are not meant for anyone but the most naive people. They don’t create these hit pieces because they expect people to actually read them, as that would make it evident they are lying. It’s intended for people to read the headline as well as for other outlets to report on the headline and not the actual “story.”

The fact that two named sources said this never happened while the invisible “source” claims it did tells you all you need to know. If it happened, why is that “whistle-blower” not revealing their identity? What does he/she/they have to lose?

I think everyone knows what this is about, which is that Kamala’s advantage with Hispanic voters continues to shrink by the day. But what makes the attempt even more pathetic is that anyone not voting for Kamala based on reasons used in the polls will likely not vote for her just because of this fake story. So I would say nice try but this was not nice and it’s no surprise how unethical the media has become, as that is what happens when they serve the interest of the people they are intended to hold accountable.

– YouTubeyoutu.be