We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

A former presidential hopeful went all-in on keeping his home state from turning blue with the lowdown on a Soros-backed scheme to hand authority to unelected bureaucrats.

“If they win Ohio, it’ll happen nationwide.”

(Video Credit: Vivek Ramaswamy)

With all eyes on the race for the White House, considerably less attention tended to be given to ballot propositions. In the Buckeye State, businessman Vivek Ramaswamy sought to remedy that as he dropped an ad and an op-ed as part of his effort to raise awareness about an alleged “Great Reset” effort using Democratic gerrymandering in Ohio.

“Issue 1 is a Democrat scheme to rig our elections to turn Ohio blue. They wanna manipulate our voting districts with an insider commission that won’t be elected or be accountable to voters. Don’t let Democrats put your voice on mute. Vote no on Issue 1,” the onetime Republican presidential candidate said in a 30-second spot about the ballot initiative.

Taking to X, Ramaswamy promoted his opposition to the state constitutional amendment as well as a New York Post op-ed he’d written, “The Great Reset is infecting Ohio. They want to take power from statewide elected officials & transfer it to unelected bureaucrats. Even worse, they’ll report you to the government if you dare to *talk to* them. If they win Ohio, it’ll happen nationwide.”

Pointing to the influence of Obama administration Attorney General Eric Holder’s National Democratic Redistricting Committee, “bankrolled by over $20 million in dark money from leftist megadonors including George Soros and Hansjörg Wyss,” he contended the amendment would undo the districting process adopted by voters in 2015 and replace it with “byzantine procedures” where “ex-judges and an outside recruitment firm would draw up a list of 45 supposedly non-partisan applicants for a new 15-member redistricting panel.”

Like Ramaswamy, an explainer video noted that the panel, intended to be comprised of five Republicans, five Democrats, and five Independents, would be “accountable to nobody” after they were selected, requiring a vote of their peers for removal from the commission.

Those in favor of Issue 1, as reported by The Columbus Dispatch, included “The Ohio Democratic Party, multiple unions, the League of Women Voters of Ohio, American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, Ohio NAACP, Planned Parenthood Advocates of Ohio” and more.

Reacting to the businessman’s post, which was viewed more than 23 million times since Monday morning, many users shared the conclusions that had been drawn, including concerns that the language limiting the ability of Ohioans to address concerns to the proposed commission.

“The idea of transferring power from elected officials to unelected bureaucrats raises concerns about accountability and transparency in governance,” said one user in part as many joined in speaking out. “The concern you’ve raised about reporting individuals to the government for merely communicating with these officials is alarming and would warrant closer scrutiny.”

Kevin Haggerty
Latest posts by Kevin Haggerty (see all)

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.