Las Vegas Review-Journal, Nevada’s largest newspaper, endorses Trump and

We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

The Las Vegas Review-Journal, the largest newspaper in the state of Nevada, just endorsed the former president in an epic breakdown of the two choices.

As America barrels toward election day, those who haven’t been able to decide whether to vote for Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump just got a huge helping hand from the Review-Journal. Their endorsement of Trump was explained by comparing the results of the two administrations, reminding the audience that Harris recently said she wouldn’t change a thing from what President Joe Biden did.

“Former President Donald Trump has run his campaign under the specter of various criminal charges, some of which were certainly prosecutorial overreach brought to cripple him politically. He is appealing a guilty verdict in a New York case involving real estate valuations and has a reasonable chance of prevailing. Mr. Trump has also been the victim of two unsuccessful assassination attempts in the past 14 weeks, one at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania, the other at a Florida golf course,” the outlet recounted.

“In the meantime, Democrats were thrown into turmoil — at least temporarily — after President Joe Biden’s dismal and sad debate performance in late June. The nationally televised fiasco provided obvious evidence of Mr. Biden’s decline, making it impossible for his party to continue to feed Americans the unadulterated nonsense that the enfeebled president remained ‘sharp as a tack.’ Within a month, Democratic power brokers maneuvered to defenestrate Mr. Biden and anoint his vice president, Kamala Harris, as their new nominee,” the outlet continued, recalling the media gaslighting that attempted to convince voters Biden was fine until Democrats could officially replace him on the ballot.

“Ms. Harris next began disavowing a host of her previous policy positions. A San Francisco leftist who sympathized with the defund-police movement, raised the prospect of dismantling Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and supported sanctuary cities now passes herself off as a tough-on-crime border hawk,” the piece explains. “A progressive once named the most liberal member of the U.S. Senate and who favored abolishing the filibuster, packing the Supreme Court and limiting political speech now shape-shifts into a defender of “democracy” and the nation’s institutions.”

“A key component in an administration that openly sought to put fossil fuel providers out of business now claims to be a proponent of fracking. A candidate who cast the tie-breaking vote for the spending package that lit the fuse to rampant inflation, devastating American families, now claims to represent the interests of the middle class. A politician who says she would have done nothing differently over the past four years wants voters to believe she is an agent for ‘change.’”

Trump’s campaign on the other hand doesn’t leave a lot of room for guesswork, reasoned the Review-Journal. They called out his response to the events of January 6 as well as his tendency for “dwelling on past grievances,” but say his presidential record gives voters a lot to think about.

“Let’s note that the Earth didn’t stop spinning while he occupied the Oval Office. Instead, his presidency was marked by relative global stability and a strong American economy. Inflation was an afterthought,” the newspaper said. “With the help of Congress, he lowered federal income taxes for the vast majority of Americans and made inroads at attacking the thicket of federal red tape that cost taxpayers billions every year while dragging down economic growth. Mr. Trump appointed scores of federal judges who respect the Constitution’s limits on government power. He tightened our southern border, pressured our allies to bear more of the financial burden for their own defense, and proved a staunch ally to Israel. When the pandemic hit, he paved the way for the rapid development of vaccines.”

The election boils down to comparing and contrasting voters’ lives under the two administrations, and that’s a matchup that Harris loses easily.

“Contrast that with the four years of the Harris-Biden administration. International chaos abounds as White House efforts at appeasement diplomacy embolden our enemies across the globe. Two major wars rage. The debt has ballooned to $35 trillion. Inflation hit 9 percent, the highest rate in four decades, in large part because Democrats can’t temper their insatiable desire to spend other people’s money. Prices for staples remain stubbornly elevated. Housing costs have soared, including in Las Vegas. High interest rates make it more difficult for new homebuyers and burden families carrying credit card and other debt. If this weren’t destructive enough, Ms. Harris and Mr. Biden turned a blind eye to the border for three years, releasing millions of illegal crossers into the country and causing mayors in blue cities to cry uncle,” the Review-Journal noted, tapping into real issues that every-day Americans are confronted with.

At the end of the day, the outlet is convinced that Trump will make a better leader than Harris for what is sure to be rough waters ahead.

“Many voters are dissatisfied with the choice before them in November. They have a point. But when we weigh the policy results of Mr. Trump’s four years in office against those of Ms. Harris and Mr. Biden, the contrast becomes difficult to ignore. Donald Trump is the better choice.”