We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

CNN’s Chris Wallace dispensed his take on one of the week’s biggest stories, Special Counsel Jack Smith’s inserting himself into the election with an updated filing of his ginned-up case against former President Donald J. Trump.

The underhanded Smith, a hyperpolitical lawfare specialist, is the toast of the town in the enclaves of the coastal elite after he intervened to swing the news cycle away from Kamala Harris’ failed Hurricane Helene response and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz’s disastrous debate, and the former Fox News anchor is among his fans.

Wallace joined vulgar leftist hack Stephen Colbert on his late-night CBS show where he was pimping his new book on the day that Smith’s filing was unveiled, circumventing the Supreme Court ruling that confirmed that Trump – like every other president – was entitled to immunity.

“The big news today everybody’s covering is Jack Smith’s filing in the 2020 election case, or rather, his evidentiary filing, having to do with whether Donald Trump’s actions were official, in other words, someone in office, or someone seeking office,” Colbert said.

“Right, because of the Supreme Court’s crazy ruling,” Wallace responded, dissing the SCOTUS ruling that temporarily derailed Smith’s effort to put Trump behind bars. “I mean, we went from 250 years without presidents having immunity for official acts…”

“And nobody talked about that with Richard Nixon and Watergate or Ronald Reagan with Iran-Contra, but suddenly an official act, you couldn’t break the law, which one, strikes me as complete nonsense and two, has resulted in Jack Smith having to write this brief saying, ‘Well, yeah, but when he did this, yeah, he was in the Oval Office, but he was using his private phone, so it was an unofficial act,’” he added, scolding the court for making Smith’s life difficult.

If there’s one thing with the Democrats and their surrogates, they’ll never stop kicking Nixon around and EVERYTHING must be related to Watergate when it comes to Trump.

“Richard Nixon, who features prominently in ‘Countdown 1960,’ It’s a beautiful cover. Don’t even read the book. Just look at the cover. Show your friends,” Colbert gushed about Wallace’s book about the 1960 election between Nixon and John F. Kennedy which comes out this month.

“No, no, no, what’s inside it is even better than what’s on the outside, but having said that, Richard Nixon during Watergate in 1974, the Supreme Court ruled that he couldn’t keep the tapes that were hidden. He had to — because it involved the possibility of a crime and had to be turned over,” Wallace said.

“So, you know, the kind of feeling on the Supreme Court seemed to be up to that point, the precedent was that a president, as opposed to a precedent, was not shielded from the law. So, this was new law that the Supreme Court decided and, I don’t know, the fact that it has a 6-3 conservative majority in three of the justices were appointed by Donald Trump, I’m sure, is totally coincidental,” he added, suggesting that the Supreme Court is acting unethically and in a partisan manner to undermine Smith and to save Trump.

“The election of 1960 holds stunning parallels to our current political climate. There were—potentially valid—claims of voter fraud and a stolen election. There was also a presidential candidate faced with the decision of whether to contest the result or honor the peaceful transfer of power,” reads the Amazon description of Wallace’s book which is set for release on October 14.

Chris Donaldson
Latest posts by Chris Donaldson (see all)

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.