The F-14 Tomcat Had 1 Big Feature the Navy Misses

We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

Range: But the F-14 Tomcat could not compete in 2025 against modern fighters and threats.

Key Points and Summary: The F-14 Tomcat, a Cold War-era fleet defense fighter, excelled in long-range engagements with a 1,600 nautical mile range and advanced swing-wing design.

-However, the U.S. Navy has shifted toward modern, multi-role fighters like the F/A-18 Super Hornet and F-35C. These newer jets, while offering slightly reduced range, are optimized for today’s networked, stealth-driven warfare and supported by advanced refueling and long-range missile-equipped naval vessels.

-The F/A-18 and F-35C’s flexibility, stealth, and advanced sensors ensure that the Navy maintains dominance, despite the retirement of the iconic F-14 Tomcat.

The F-14 Tomcat vs. Modern Jets: Why Range Isn’t Everything

The F-14 Tomcat was a cornerstone of U.S. Navy air power for much of the Cold War and, after, designed from the outset for long-range defense of aircraft carriers and their strike groups.

As a carrier-based fighter, it was optimized to intercept threats such as Soviet fighters, bombers, and missiles before they could fire at American aircraft carriers.

To that end, the F-14 sported twin engines and a swing-wing design, which gave the jet a very long loiter time and allowed it to engage targets at extreme distances. 

Its range, approximately 1,600 nautical miles, afforded it the ability to operate far from its carrier, making it an ideal fleet defense fighter.

In comparison, the aircraft that succeeded the F-14, the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, and the F-35C, the carrier-based F-35 variant, have slightly shorter unrefueled ranges—around 1,275 nautical miles and 1,200 nautical miles, respectively. 

This reduction in range may appear to be a shortcoming of the aircraft designs. It is actually reflective of broader changes in United States Navy operational doctrine and advances in naval aviation technology.

Following the end of the Cold War, the Navy shifted focus from long-range engagements and strikes by manned jets to a more flexible, networked, and multi-role approach to air power. Aircraft are no longer given narrower mission profiles like the F-14’s fleet defense role. 

Instead, modern naval aviation is a multi-role aircraft designed to complete a variety of mission profiles, from strike missions to close air support and electronic warfare.

Air-to-Air Refueling

Aerial refueling also mitigates the reduced range of these newer platforms. Modern carrier strike groups benefit from the presence of tanker aircraft, which can extend the operational reach of both the Super Hornet and F-35C. 

While the F-14 could also be refueled from the air, it lacked the networked capabilities of today’s aircraft that transformed the modern Carrier Strike Group.

Changing Naval Doctrine Means the F-14 Tomcat Is Obsolete 

The United States Navy has reformed its carrier strike group strategy. Now, the Navy relies less on long-range aircraft operations and more on the capabilities of other vessels. Guided missile destroyers, cruisers, and submarines — most of which are outfitted with long-range missiles — now play a central role in power projection and carrier group defense. 

F-14 Tomcat. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

These ships can launch Tomahawk cruise missiles and other precision munitions to strike far away targets which puts less of a reliance on carrier aircraft to conduct long-range interdiction and strike missions.

The F/A-18 and F-35C are also designed to operate in much more modern combat environments than the F-14, environments where stealth, advanced sensors, and multi-role versatility are of incredible importance. These jets excel in that environment, despite their slightly lower range compared to the F-14 Tomcat.

Although the F-14 Tomcat boasted a better range, that ability reflected its Cold War-era mission as a long-range fleet defense and interceptor aircraft.

In contrast, the U.S. Navy’s adoption of the F/A-18 and F-35C is emblematic of a shift toward a more networked and flexible kind of naval warfare.

Combined with the long-range strike capabilities of today’s Carrier Strike Group, the slight reduction in range of today’s fighters compared to the Tomcat is more than made up for by stealth ability in the case of the F-35, and multi-mission capabilities.

Despite modern carrier fighter’s slightly reduced range, today’s naval fighters vastly outclass the F-14 Tomcat.

About the Author: Caleb Larson 

Caleb Larson is an American multiformat journalist based in Berlin, Germany. His work covers the intersection of conflict and society, focusing on American foreign policy and European security. He has reported from Germany, Russia, and the United States. Most recently, he covered the war in Ukraine, reporting extensively on the war’s shifting battle lines from Donbas and writing on the war’s civilian and humanitarian toll. Previously, he worked as a Defense Reporter for POLITICO Europe. You can follow his latest work on X.