We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

It’s amazing what one shocking election will do. DEI is dying fast—even at McDonald’s! (Which never needed it in the first place, but never mind.) And then someone woke up (irony alert!) and noticed that Trump carried 65% of the votes of Native Americans, who I am sure Trump will refer to as Indians, to the delight of a majority of native Americans who wanted to keep “Redskins” as the team name for the DC NFL franchise. Apparently all those virtue-signaling “land acknowledgements” intended to help guilty white people feel better about themselves, as was pointed out several times here in the past, didn’t work as intended.

So naturally a few people on the left have woken up (heh, again) and are suggesting maybe the whole land acknowledgement thing ought to be dropped. Here’s Kathleen Duval, a leftist historian at the University of North Carolina, in the New York Times on Monday:

. . . [T]hey’ve begun to sound more like rote obligations, and Indigenous scholars tell me there can be tricky politics involved with naming who lived on what land and who their descendants are. Land acknowledgments might have outlived their usefulness.

From here the article reverts to predictable form, essentially calling for more welfare state solicitude for Indians. Suggestion: If Trump really wants to have fun, he should propose renaming the Bureau of Indian Affairs (amazing that neither the Obama or Biden administrations didn’t change the name) to some kind of MAGA-friendly title. Maybe “Administration for Veterans of Warrior Tribes” or something.

But if some of the most prominent aspects of wokery are in retreat, one significant aspect of leftism continues to rage out of control: campus anti-Semitism. Our friends at the Buckley Institute at Yale have released their latest survey of Yale students, and the findings are shocking:

An outright majority (55%) of Yale undergraduates believe “Israel’s war in Gaza is morally wrong and genocidal, even if [they] think the October 7 terror attacks were wrong as well.” A third (34%) believe “Israel has the right to defend itself and its people from terror, even if [they] don’t agree with every action Israel has conducted in the war.” 8% believe October 7 was justified resistance.

I wonder how many of those 8% who think the Hamas attack was justified are foreign students. . .

My proposed counter-slogan: From the river to the sea, full Israeli sovereignty! [Actually I think “Lucretia” thought of this first.]

P.S. For more on this problem, see John Ellis, “Why Are Our Campuses Seething with Anti-Semitism?” The answer will not surprise anyone.