We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

We all know that The View routinely broadcasts claims that ABC attorneys have to force them to walk back. One show before the election featured four disclaimers read on-air, at least a couple by Sunny Hostin herself, which has to have set some sort of record. This legal exposure — in every sense of the word — might end up in the Broadcasting Hall of Fame. Or Shame. YMMV.

Advertisement

On the December 11 show, The View discussed the Left’s sexual fascination with back-shooting coward Luigi Mangione, who assassinated United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson and had recently been captured. The hosts debated whether Mangione deserved any sympathy, and that’s when Hostin decided to add in her two cents. Or rather, her physician husband’s two cents, so to speak:

SUNNY HOSTIN: I mean, I agree with mostly everything that’s been said. I mean, we know that, you know, only about 31 percent of Americans trust our healthcare system. We have a terrible healthcare system. And, you know, doctors suffer because of big corporations, as well. Doctors that want to do good like my husband, you know, operates on someone even though they don’t have insurance and then has to sue health insurance companies to get paid for the work that he’s been trained his whole life to do.

Advertisement

Fondacaro wrote at that time that Hostin’s claim sounded very strange. How could Dr. Hostin “sue health insurance companies” to pay bills for patients they don’t cover? “Judging by what she said,” Fondacaro concluded, “it appeared as though her husband was trying to bill insurance companies for people who were not their customers.”

Coincidentally or not, that’s exactly what an insurance company’s attorneys also concluded. Six days after that episode aired, but only revealed yesterday, Dr. Emmanuel Hostin got named in a $450 million RICO lawsuit, one of almost 200 defendants facing allegations of insurance fraud:

Orthopedic surgeon Dr. Emmanuel ‘Manny’ Hostin is among nearly 200 defendants named in one of the largest RICO cases ever filed in New York.

He and many of the others are accused or getting kickbacks by performing surgery and fraudulently billing a company that insures taxi companies and Uber and Lyft drivers.

‘Hostin knowingly provided fraudulent medical and other healthcare services including arthroscopic surgeries,’ the lawsuit, filed on December 17, claims.

The insurance firm American Transit was then billed ‘in exchange for kickbacks and/or other compensation which were disguised as dividends or other cash distributions.’

Advertisement

The irony here is that Hostin is a former federal prosecutor herself. She specialized in antitrust cases and later child abuse crimes rather than fraud, but she certainly had to know that her explanation on air made no sense whatsoever except as a rationalization for insurance fraud. Of course, given the number of disclaimers that ABC’s attorneys have forced her to read on-air these days, it’s not clear whether her legal background does her much good in her current career.

Dr. Hostin hasn’t yet gone to trial, and perhaps the complaint against him will be dropped at some point. Since his wife detailed his shady business practices on air, though, the plaintiffs might not be inclined to cut a deal with Sunny’s husband. They might be inclined to depose Sunny to see what else she can tell them about how her husband conducts his business, especially in attempting to force insurers to pay bills for people they don’t cover. 

Given the timing and scope of the lawsuit, attorneys have likely been building this case for months, and Hostin’s remarks probably had little impact on their decision to file on December 17. But that raises another question: why would Hostin make this claim while insurance attorneys were finalizing this lawsuit? This couldn’t have come completely out of left field; investigators would have been interrogating witnesses, subpoenaing records, and presenting evidence to support their filing. How could Sunny Hostin think that discussing her husband’s business practices on air would be a good idea while hostile attorneys were crawling all over these transactions?

Advertisement

Update: I misread the Daily Mail story; this is not a prosecution — it’s a lawsuit brought by one of the insurers that Hostin allegedly defrauded. I have amended the post to reflect that in several places above. But if the plaintiffs can make a strong enough case, prosecutors will no doubt take an interest too, especially given Sunny’s public remarks.