Arizona attorney general colluded with anti-Trump organization on election

We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

Arizona attorney general colluded with anti-Trump organization on election lawfare

Former Arizona Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Clark has uncovered a retainer agreement between the Arizona Attorney General’s office and the far-left organization States United Democracy Center, suggesting collusion on legal strategies to suppress critics of Arizona’s election laws.
The partnership was formed just nine days before Attorney General Kris Mayes secured sweeping indictments against 18 individuals associated with President-elect Donald Trump, raising questions about the timing and possible political motivations.
The SUDC, led by Norm Eisen, a key figure in Trump’s first impeachment, has a history of anti-Trump actions, including hosting conference calls with globalist leaders to strategize against Trump.
The grand jury empaneled by Mayes indicted not only those directly involved in alleged election interference but also Trump campaign attorney Christina Bobb and legal adviser Jenna Ellis, despite being told they were not under investigation.
The partnership with the States United Democracy Center reflects a trend of election lawfare as a political weapon, raising serious questions about the fairness and impartiality of the legal process and eroding public trust in election integrity.

Former Arizona Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Clark has uncovered damning evidence linking the Arizona Attorney General’s Office to the far-left organization States United Democracy Center (SUDC).

The documents, which include a retainer agreement, provide evidence that the office has been colluding with SUDC on legal strategies amid political maneuvering attempts meant to suppress critics of Arizona’s election laws and recent election results.

The agreement, obtained by Clark, outlines the terms under which SUDC will advise the Arizona Attorney General’s Office on “developing legal strategies to ensure the integrity and security of elections.”

The timing of this partnership is particularly egregious, coming just nine days before Attorney General Kris Mayes secured a sweeping set of indictments against 18 individuals associated with President-elect Donald Trump, who was accused of attempting to overturn the 2020 presidential election. (Related: Missouri AG to sue NY over “unconstitutional lawfare” against Trump.)

The implications of this collusion are far-reaching. Not only does it suggest a targeted and politically motivated attack on Trump supporters, but it also reflects a disturbing trend of election lawfare being used as a political weapon. This partnership raises questions about the justice system’s integrity and whether the prosecutions were truly based on valid legal grounds or were, in fact, a politically motivated campaign.

SUDC has a long history of anti-Trump actions

The anti-Trump rhetoric doesn’t end there. Norm Eisen, the executive chair of the SUDC and a key figure in Trump’s first impeachment back during his first term, has a long history of anti-Trump actions.

In April 2024, the National Pulse reported that Eisen had been hosting weekly conference calls with globalist leaders and deep state apparatchiks to strategize on expanding the lawfare campaign against Trump.

This latest revelation adds another layer to the complex web of power and politics in Arizona. The grand jury empaneled by Mayes went beyond her initial intentions, indicting not only those directly involved in alleged election interference but also Trump campaign attorney Christina Bobb and legal adviser Jenna Ellis.

The question that looms large is what motivated Mayes to pursue such a sweeping and controversial indictment. The fact that Mayes’ office has retained the aid of the SUDC does not help her case of being politically motivated to pursue indictments against Trump and his allies.

Critics of Mayes’ office are quick to point out that this collaboration is reminiscent of election lawfare tactics seen in other states. They argue that such collusion undermines public trust in the electoral process and smacks of partisanship.

Furthermore, the indictment of individuals who were not under investigation, coupled with this newly revealed partnership, raises serious questions about the fairness and impartiality of the legal process.

BigGovernment.news has more stories like this.

Watch the video below that talks about the Deep State preparing for Trump’s second term.

This video is from the Dan Radiostyle channel on Brighteon.com.