We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

Thanks to a new law signed by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, teens under 16 will lose their social media accounts come Jan. 1st.

Signed in March, months after the bill passed through the state House, the law bans children under 16 from using social media, although children who are 14 or 15 may bypass the restriction with  explicit parental permission.

“The law does not name any specific platform but says it applies to any that promote ‘infinite scrolling,’ display reaction metrics such as likes and shares, feature auto-play videos and have live-streaming and push notifications,” according to Newsweek.

This means the major players like X and Facebook are all affected.

The law has sparked opposition, particularly from Democrats, but DeSantis is confident it won’t be overturned by legal challenge.

“Any time I see a bill, if I don’t think it’s constitutional, I veto it,” he reportedly said, explaining why. “We not only satisfied me, but we also satisfied, I think, a fair application of the law and Constitution.”

Democrats and their allies claim the bill is a violation of parental rights and even free speech rights.

“Though I agree more needs to be done in protecting our youth on social media, this bill goes too far in taking away parents’ rights and banning social media usage—and thus First Amendment Rights—for young Floridians,” state Rep Anna Eskamani said in March.

“Instead of banning social media access, it would be better to ensure improved parental oversight tools, improved access to data to stop bad actors, alongside major investments in Florida’s mental health systems and programs,” she added.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Florida agrees.

In a statement issued in March, ACLU Legislative Director Kara Gross argued that the law “raises significant constitutional concerns because it intrudes on the free speech rights of adults and minors.”

“The new law also prohibits minors under the age of 14 from having social media accounts even with the consent of their parents,” she said. “This is a complete disregard for parental rights. The government shouldn’t be controlling what ideas and information parents can allow their children to access.”

“This law is not narrowly tailored to achieve the stated interest of protecting youth from harm. If our lawmakers truly cared about the well-being of our children, they would be prioritizing expanding Medicaid access to struggling families, increasing school psychologists, ensuring access to affordable housing for families, and protecting families with minor children from facing eviction,” she added.

Among conservatives, many parents have split feelings about the law. On one hand, they appreciate that the law does protect children. But on the other hand, they worry about government intrusion into parental rights.

“The concept is good. I just see implementation very 1984,” one critic tweeted. “People will need ID. There will be ID thefts all over. Scammers and kids will find a way to obtain ID’s. I believe it is opening a can of worms, maybe better left up to parents.”

“That really should be up to the parents,” another conservative, this one a Trump supporter, tweeted. “We don’t need a nanny state here in Florida. Hopefully that will be overturned by the supreme court, as it is unconstitutional and an overreach of government.”

However, for virtually every critic, there’s an avid supporter.

Case in point:

Vivek Saxena
Latest posts by Vivek Saxena (see all)

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.