We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

The New York Times has this “news” report on Matt Gaetz, whose nomination the paper is desperate to defeat:

An unidentified hacker gained access to a file shared in a secure link among lawyers with clients who have given damaging testimony related to Matt Gaetz, President-elect Donald J. Trump’s choice to be attorney general, a person with knowledge of the activity said.

The file is said to include sworn testimony by a woman who said that she had sex with Mr. Gaetz in 2017 when she was 17, in addition to testimony by a second woman who said that she had witnessed the encounter. The material does not appear to have been made public by the hacker.

So the Times is repeating a claim allegedly made by two anonymous women, which allegedly was discovered by an unknown hacker, and is now being retailed to the Times by an anonymous “person with knowledge of the activity.” That is what left-wing journalism has come to. I think it is now fair to say that any connection between what is reported by the New York Times and the truth is strictly coincidental.