We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

A famous global chocolate maker has been pressured to dubiously admit in court that its chocolate isn’t so great after all.

The story begins in 2022 when Consumer Reports ran a story about chocolate bars containing lead and cadmium. One of the world’s top chocolate producers, Lindt and Sprüngli, was implicated in the story.

Lindt is especially famous for claiming its chocolates are “expertly crafted with the finest ingredients” and “safe, as well as delightful.”

Responding to the story, several consumers from Alabama, California, Florida, Illinois, Nevada, and New York filed suit against Lindt in 2023, arguing that its marketing was clearly fraudulent.

“[C]onsumers insisted in the class action lawsuit that they had paid premium prices for Lindt because they believed they were ‘purchasing quality and safe dark chocolate,’” according to Fortune magazine.

Here’s where the story takes a wild turn.

In a desperate bid to avoid losing, Lindt’s attorneys argued that the brand’s marketing claims were “puffery,” which was defined as “exaggerated advertising, blustering, and boasting upon which no reasonable buyer would rely.”

Ouch.

Yet despite this admission, Lindt continues to maintain its products are excellent and that the Consumer Reports’ story is false.

“Lindt & Sprungli disagrees with all the allegations made in the US lawsuit,” the company told AFP late Monday. “Our Lindt & Sprungli quality and safety procedures ensure that all products comply with all applicable safety standards and declaration requirements and are safe to consume.”

As for the “puffery” argument made in court, the company claims it was just a clever “technical” legal move “used to clarify that an advertising challenged by plaintiffs is not sufficiently objective to support the specific false advertising claim being made.”

Despite seemingly once again admitting that its products are not excellent, the company nevertheless still stands by its dubious claims of “excellence.”

“Our consumers can have full confidence in that,” the company told AFP.

Maybe the consumers who didn’t sue you…

Responding to all this, social media users were mainly full of jokes.

Look:

Lindt last made headlines around the start of the year when it was accused of allowing prohibited child labor practices among its cocoa farmers.

“Ghanaian children help produce cocoa for Swiss chocolate manufacturer Lindt & Sprüngli, according to a recent report by Swiss public television SRF,” SWI swissinfo reported at the time.

“SRF’s report revealed a number of children working in Lindt & Sprüngli’s supply chain. In the village of Mfenibu, for example, six-year-old Kennedy and his eight-year-old brother Ebenezer were collecting and carrying cocoa pods,” the reporting continued.

“I have to rely on the children,” their widowed grandmother, cocoa farmer Lucy Ajubie, told the outlet, adding that she was in debt.

Lindt responded to the allegations with a written statement deflecting blame and arguing that “fighting child labour requires efforts on the part of governments, non-governmental organisations, companies, local institutions, schools, and farmers.”

In fairness to the company, since 2016 it’s been making unannounced visits to coca farmers to check for child labor.

“Over the course of 8,491 surprise visits in 2021, the company discovered 87 child workers,” SWI notes.

Vivek Saxena
Latest posts by Vivek Saxena (see all)

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.