We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

Gen X, of which this editor is a proud member, decided the election for Donald Trump, with 53 percent going for the former and future president. As Twitchy reported, after she’d blamed white women for delivering North Carolina to Trump, she turned her ire to Gen X, to which Gen X responded, “Whatever.”

Advertisement

As we’ve been reporting, Scientific American has seemed to be less and less about science in the past few years. Back in May, the editorial board published a scathing indictment of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and his “anti-science agenda.” (Scientific American has fully bought into transgender activism and claims bias, not biology, is to blame for the athletic differences between men and women.) Then, in September, “Scientific American” published its endorsement of Kamala Harris for president for all of the science she’d bring to the White House. it was only the second time in the magazine’s 179-year history that it had endorsed a candidate.

The Rabbit Hole has captured some posts on Bluesky (the anti-Nazi alternative to X) from editor-in-chief Laura Helmuth, who apologizes on behalf of Gen X, which is full of f**king fascists, and asks for resources to help people “devastated by the election.”

Recommended

Advertisement

Advertisement

Way back in 2018, Nature found that assigning gender by the genitals one is born with “has no foundation in science.” Nature also endorsed Joe Biden back in 2020.

Yeah, that’s purely CYA. She meant every word she wrote … it wasn’t “shock and confusion.”

***