Former poly-sci professor says her election prediction was wrong because

We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

This White Woman for Harris claims to be a “political analyst,” and her early election night analysis has gone viral over the past couple days. Now, it’s been coupled with her post-election analysis, and it’s pure gold.

Watch:

Boy that giggly smile sure disappeared fast, Dr. Arlene!

Lady really thought it was going to be a Harris landslide!

And she wasn’t wrong, no. It was racism and misogyny that screwed up her data.

So as you know Kamala Harris did not win the election. As the numbers stand right now there were 18 million fewer votes than in 2020. And as I have said all along, you have to have a huge, huge turnout and it goes to the Dems, and we didn’t have it.

There is one fundamental thing that you cannot account for when you’re using data to predict or project the outcome of an election, is you can’t factor in the impact of racism, or the existence of racism, and misogyny.