We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed a lower court ruling last week, determining that mail-in ballots with incorrect dates or no dates on the exterior of the envelope cannot be counted. This decision is a significant win for advocates of election integrity.

In a 4-3 ruling, the state’s highest court stated that the lower court, which had deemed the mandate unenforceable, should not have heard the case since it did not involve election boards from all 67 counties, according to The Associated Press. In Pennsylvania, counties are responsible for administering elections, but the left-leaning groups that filed the case only sued two counties—Philadelphia and Allegheny.

Two weeks prior, the Commonwealth Court had paused the enforcement of handwritten dates on exterior envelopes. The Supreme Court’s reversal of this decision now raises the possibility that thousands of ballots arriving on time could be discarded in a crucial swing state, potentially affecting the outcome of a closely contested presidential race. Notably, more Democrats tend to vote by mail in this battleground state than Republicans.

Republican groups that appealed the decision hailed it as a significant victory for honesty in elections and a major boost for former President Donald Trump, who narrowly lost Pennsylvania to Joe Biden in 2020.

Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Whatley, in a release, called it a major victory for election integrity “that will protect commonsense mail ballot safeguards and help voters cast their ballots with confidence.”

The state high court’s ruling came just ahead of Pennsylvania’s voter registration deadline of Oct. 21, which is Monday. State election officials note that if residents want to vote in this year’s elections, they have to be registered by then.

Attorneys representing the ten left-wing ‘community’ organizations that filed the lawsuit stated that the decision left the door open for further litigation on the issue.

“Thousands of voters are at risk of having their ballots rejected in November for making a meaningless mistake,” said Mimi McKenzie, legal director of the Public Interest Law Center in Philadelphia. She urged voters to “carefully read and follow the instructions for submitting a mail-in ballot to reduce the number of ballots being rejected for trivial paperwork errors.”

Two Democratic appointees joined both Republican appointees on the state Supreme Court in the ruling.

The lawsuit, filed in May, challenged the enforceability of the mandate based on a state constitutional provision ensuring that all elections are “free and equal,” the AP reported.

Recent elections in Pennsylvania suggest that more than 10,000 ballots in this year’s general election could be discarded due to incorrect or missing envelope dates—potentially influencing the outcome of the presidential race. With Pennsylvania’s 19 electoral votes making it the largest prize among the seven swing states, this issue carries significant weight, the outlet added.

Historically, Pennsylvania has rejected ballots for missing dates or for dates that are clearly incorrect, such as those in the future or before mail-in ballots were printed. While state law mandates dates on envelopes, election officials do not use them to determine the timeliness of ballots. Instead, mail-in ballots are logged and time-stamped upon receipt and must arrive at county election offices before the polls close on Election Day said the AP.

Last month, in a broad new executive order that former President Donald Trump praised, GOP Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin mandated that all ballots for the 2024 presidential election must be on paper. But the Biden-Harris Justice Department promptly sued, claiming federal law prevents him from making the change so close to an election.

The post Pennsylvania Supreme Court Makes Huge Ruling Regarding Mail-In Ballots appeared first on Conservative Brief.