We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

You ever notice how every “ethicist” is nothing more than a stuffed shirt trying to justify maximum human suffering?

This bioethicist, S. Matthew Liao from NYU, is no exception. We’ve previously covered his desire to make humans allergic to meat, but a different video is now circulating and we think it’s important for you to remember that Bond villains like this are out there:

I want to consider a class of solutions that have never been considered before: Human engineering! It involves the biomedical modification of human beings.

Yes, if all our babies in the future are going to be lab grown then why can’t the very smart and ethical scientists screw around with the genetics for their political purposes?

That’s his idea.

18% of greenhouse gas emissions come from livestock farming. So if we eat less meat, we could significantly reduce our greenhouse gas emissions …

Yes, this is to “solve” the cow farts “problem.”

Your burger is destroying the planet.

Some people would be willing to eat less meat …

… but they lack the willpower. Human engineering could help. [chuckles]

Just as some people are naturally intolerant to milk or crayfish, like myself, we could artificially induce mild intolerance to meat [applause] by stimulating our immune system against common bovine proteins, and in this way we can create an aversion to eating meat and eco-unfriendly food.

Yeah, no. We aren’t going to eat the bugs. We aren’t going to live in the pods. We aren’t going to wear the bovine allergy patch.

Get outta here with your desire to destroy human joy because of your BS climate religion.

P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇


Keep up with our latest videos — Subscribe to our YouTube channel!