We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

Minnesota Governor and VP candidate Tim Walz spoke with Fox News’ Shannon Bream over the weekend about abortion and the Harris-Walz plan to enshrine the protections of Roe into law.

Walz lied about Trump’s abortion stance while trying to hide the extremism of his own.

Bream highlighted that Minnesota law puts no restrictions on abortion.

“Look, the vice president and I have been clear, the restoration of Roe versus Wade is what we’re asking for —” Walz said.

“That law goes far beyond Roe v. Wade,” Bream fired back, prompting Walz to say the law is “very clear.”

“But wait, wait — but let’s agree. What you signed is there’s not a single limit through nine months of pregnancy. Roe had a trimester framework that did have limits through the pregnancy. The Minnesota law does not have that,” Bream pushed back.

Walz stated that his state’s law “puts the decision with the woman and her healthcare providers” and then lied about Donald Trump wanting to sign a national abortion ban.

“He has said repeatedly that he will not sign a national abortion ban — are you calling that a flat-out lie?” Bream asked Walz.

“Yes, of course, and Senator Vance has in the past said so too. Now look, they may see this as an election issue. We see it as a right of women to make their own bodily decisions, and that’s what the states, like my state, have the ability to put that in. States like Georgia force women to cross the border, and then we have the death of Amber Thurman,” Walz responded.

“So let’s be very clear, trying to cut hairs on an issue on this is not where the American public’s at,” Walz continued. “They want the restoration of Roe versus Wade. Vice President Harris said she would sign it. That’s what we’ll do when we’re elected — ”

Then, Bream dropped a brutal fact check on Walz.

“Okay but to be clear the Minnesota law is far beyond Roe v. Wade and about the Amber Thurman case in Georgia, her family has — and it’s tragic, she is a young mother who left behind a young son. But what her family has said is it was a complication from an abortion pill that she received and she didn’t get proper care when she went to a Georgia hospital, which had multiple opportunities to intervene there,” Bream said.

“Her own attorney, the family’s attorney, says it wasn’t the Georgia law, it was the hospitals, what he claims is malpractice, not treating her when she clearly showed up in distress and still had the byproducts of her pregnancy because of that rare complication from the abortion pill,” Bream concluded. “So just to be clear on the Georgia law and how her family and her attorney sees it.”

Watch the clip below: