We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

Over the weekend, CNN’s Michael Smerconish stressed that Kamala Harris will “eventually” have to answer for her blatant policy flip-flops — she can’t duck the press forever.

Harris has not sat down for an interview, spoken to the press, or released any robust policy information to speak of; her website doesn’t even have a policy section.

“Kamala Harris is not indestructible. She has served as an undistinguished, nearly invisible vice president. There appears no accomplishment she can point to for her most important responsibility, addressing the origin of the border crisis,” Smerconish said.

“Thus far, Harris has had a free ride. She has not given any media interviews, hasn’t faced voter questioning. When asked recently, she said that she would give an interview by the end of the month. She said that on August the eighth. No doubt she wants more time on the clock to prepare answers as to why she’s flipped on health care, fracking, weed, and the death penalty, to name just a few,” he added. “Sooner or later, she’s going to be held accountable and face pressure that she has thus far largely avoided.”

Smerconish says that anti-Israel protests could cause trouble for Harris at the DNC this week.

“You’d think that she’ll enjoy another week of positive coverage amidst the DNC [Democratic National Committee], which will feature three democratic presidents, but with passions inflamed about Israel and Gaza, there is an air of unpredictability as to what will happen in Chicago,” he added.

Smerconish also feels that Republicans are hitting Harris’ running mat Tim Walz too hard over stolen valor accusations and not enough on his DUI arrest.

“I thought the DUI issue was a really significant and serious issue. I know that Republicans have spent a lot of time talking about the alleged stolen valor,” Smerconish said on Friday, raising his fingers into air-quotes. “My own opinion, for what it’s worth, having studied the facts, is that there’s no there-there. Walz spoke sloppily, should not have represented a role that he had as having been a permanent role when it wasn’t. But the DUI story is indefensible.”

Watch the clip below: