We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

Guys, I know we’re beating a dead horse, raising the alarm about Biden’s “radical left” agenda.

But sometimes the extreme leftward and radical push from the White House just hits you square between the eyes. And when the New York Times writes headlines like these, you know that there’s a massive story underneath.

The Biden Administration, particularly Babylon Bee’s Man of the Year Rachel Levine, is so radical on the trans issue that it is pushing WPATH to THE LEFT and successfully pressured them to remove any age recommendations for trans surgeries and hormone treatment for kids.

If you want to know more about WPATH, I would recommend reading the two exposés we’ve written on the organization before 👇

Emails from WPATH were obtained in a case in Alabama involving that state’s law banning the practice of trans surgeries on kids, and the emails were so damning that The New York Times is reporting this story with a straight face.

Health officials in the Biden administration pressed an international group of medical experts to remove age limits for adolescent surgeries from guidelines for care of transgender minors, according to newly unsealed court documents.

Age minimums, officials feared, could fuel growing political opposition to such treatments.

Conservative states began banning the genital and bodily mutilation known as “affirming” care, and Levine, a formerly married man named Richard who now dresses like a woman, asked the world’s largest trans health group to drop their extremely radical age minimums.

Why?

Because the Biden Admin didn’t want to have to explain why a minimum would ever be appropriate.

The previous recommendations, before Levine manipulated WPATH into removing them, were, “14 for hormonal treatments, 15 for mastectomies, 16 for breast augmentation or facial surgeries, and 17 for genital surgeries or hysterectomies.”

But Levine thought those guidelines would give fuel to ban the practice on younger children.

He couldn’t allow that.

One excerpt from an unnamed member of the WPATH guideline development group recalled a conversation with Sarah Boateng, then serving as Admiral Levine’s chief of staff: ‘She [sic] is confident, based on the rhetoric she [sic] is hearing in D.C., and from what we have already seen, that these specific listings of ages, under 18, will result in devastating legislation for trans care. She [sic] wonders if the specific ages can be taken out.’

Another email stated that Admiral Levine ‘was very concerned that having ages (mainly for surgery) will affect access to care for trans youth and maybe adults, too. Apparently the situation in the U.S.A. is terrible and she [sic] and the Biden administration worried that having ages in the document will make matters worse. She [sic] asked us to remove them.’

Even some who worked with WPATH (again, we’re talking about a far-left organization that is too extreme for European countries) saw the changes and objected.

In other emails released this week, some WPATH members voiced their disagreement with the proposed changes. ‘If our concern is with legislation (which I don’t think it should be — we should be basing this on science and expert consensus if we’re being ethical) wouldn’t including the ages be helpful?’ one member wrote. ‘I need someone to explain to me how taking out the ages will help in the fight against the conservative anti-trans agenda.’

It’s too radical for WPATH members.

P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇


Keep up with our latest videos — Subscribe to our YouTube channel!