We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

Harvard’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences announced to staff Monday that it was changing hiring requirements so they no longer include a diversity, inclusion, and belonging statement, according to The Boston Globe.

The Faculty of Arts and Sciences, the university’s largest department, has required diversity statements for new hires for the past five years, according to the Globe. Staff and faculty learned this week, however, that the school was dropping the requirement and would now ask applicants to tenure-track positions for a “service statement” that “describes efforts to strengthen academic communities, e.g. department, institution, and/or professional societies.”

Randall Kennedy, a professor at Harvard Law School, wrote in an April op-ed for the Harvard Crimson, a student newspaper, that he believed it was time for the university to do away with the requirement.

“Candidates for academic positions at Harvard should not be asked to support ideological commitments,” Kennedy wrote. “Imagine the howl of protest that would (or should) erupt if a school at Harvard asked a candidate for a faculty position to submit a statement of their orientation towards capitalism, or patriotism, or Making America Great Again with a clear expectation of allegiance? Such pressure constitutes an encroachment upon the intellectual freedom that ought to be part of the enjoyment of academic life.”

Many schools have faced criticism over their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies in recent months, and some have made similar decisions to Harvard’s by eliminating their diversity regulations and departments.

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology banned diversity statements in applications for faculty in April. MIT President Sally Kornbluth previously told the Daily Caller News Foundation that “compelled statements impinge on freedom of expression.”

Harvard’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation