We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.

Subscribe to Louder with Crowder on Rumble! Download the app on Apple and Google Play.

This isn’t the first time Calif. State Democrats have voted to protect child predators and this probably won’t be the last.

The state already has no intention of enforcing federal immigration laws, so much so that officials have dedicated 155,812 square miles as a sanctuary for illegal aliens. And it turns out that you can have your cake and eat it, too. Because state lawmakers have just voted to protect illegal immigrants who also commit the worst crimes against children.

According to The Daily Caller:

California Assemblyman Bill Essayli had his microphone turned off today when he forced a vote on an assembly bill that seeks to end California’s ‘sanctuary state’ protections for illegal immigrant pedophiles.

“Assembly Democrats unanimously blocked the vote [on Assembly Bill 2641], thus allowing illegal immigrant pedophiles to remain protected from deportation,” the California Republican Assembly Caucus stated to Daily Caller in a press release.

“I’m completely outraged that when we had an opportunity today to roll back sanctuary state policies that protect illegal immigrants who are convicted of committing sex crimes against minors – we’re talking about pedophiles – [and] that every Democrat in that building refused to support it,” Essayli said during his Media Availability block following the vote, which he posted to YouTube.

Is anyone surprised? No? Didn’t think so.

Question: Why do Democrats believe that illegal immigrants should be protected at all costs, no matter the crimes they commit? Why do they think that just because someone has broken federal immigration laws that should afford them protection when committing crimes against children? Because I am having a hard time seeing how this benefits our most vulnerable population.

This is what lawmakers think is an appropriate use of their time. How is this even legal? Their job is to protect our freedoms, not give foreign nationals a pass on the most evil acts one can commit.

This is why there’s no such thing as special rights, only human rights. When you start making laws for a certain group of people, aka illegal aliens, it’s almost always done so at the expense of everyone else.

Just last week a 17-year-old girl was trafficked over the Southern Border into Calif. Fortunately, she was able to discreetly text 911 for help. However, these are the type of people Democrats protect when they make these laws. Any law that protects illegals from deportation has a direct correlation with protecting human traffickers, as the link with the Southern Border is undeniable. But none of that matters as long as those who blatantly disregard federal immigration laws are never illegal.

Someone should really tell the left that just because a person comes from a crappy country with a bad economy, that doesn’t de facto make them a good person worthy of all criminal protections. But none of that matters in the progressive pursuit of an open-border utopia.

And the most insane thing is that these are the same people who turn around and point the finger at parents and label them ‘child abusers’ because they won’t trans their kids. When in reality, the psychological projection couldn’t be any more obvious, as they have made it clear their priority is against protecting kids.



Gavin Newsom “SAYS YES” to RUINING CALIFORNIA | Louder With Crowderwww.youtube.com