We support our Publishers and Content Creators. You can view this story on their website by CLICKING HERE.
According to a statement by the company, Pfizer has stopped COVID pill trial after the latest results showed that it did not reduce symptoms, hospitalizations and deaths.
Pfizer has stated it will halt participation in a clinical trial for Paxlovid, its COVID-19 antiviral medication, for standard-risk COVID-19 patients after the most recent findings revealed the medication did not numerically greatly lower symptoms, hospitalizations, or fatalities.
In more than 65 nations, including the United States, Paxlovid, a combination of the antivirals nirmatrelvir and ritonavir, is presently approved or authorized for conditional or emergency use in the treatment of COVID-19 patients at high risk of developing severe illness, including hospitalization or death.
According to a statement made by Pfizer on June 14, it will “cease enrollment into the EPIC-SR trial due to low rate of hospitalization or death in the standard-risk population.”
The business asserted that it will nonetheless incorporate the new information in its impending application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to request complete authorization for the administration of Paxlovid to high-risk COVID-19 individuals.
“The company will focus efforts on generating further data on PAXLOVID in vulnerable populations, including longer treatment durations in immunocompromised individuals, as well as exploring other clinical development opportunities, such as its potential use in hospitalized patients with severe disease,” Pfizer added.
Patients with COVID-19 who do not have risk factors for serious illness are referred to be standard-risk patients. They may or may not have received vaccinations.
Results From Trial
Paxlovid and a placebo were compared in the August 2021 beginning of the EPIC-SR study in adult patients with symptomatic COVID-19 who are not hospitalized and “are at low risk of progressing to severe illness.”
Pfizer revealed that Paxlovid results fell short of the study’s objective of “self-reported, sustained alleviation of all symptoms for four consecutive days, as compared to placebo” in December 2021.
When contrasted to the placebo group (10 out of 426 hospitalized, with no deaths), the Paxlovid group’s hospitalizations were reduced by 70% (3 out of 428 hospitalizations, with no deaths). But because the findings were not statistically significant, it is possible that chance played a role.
On June 14, Pfizer revealed that an updated assessment of 1,153 patients who had been enrolled through December 2021 had revealed a 51 percent difference between the two groups in terms of hospitalization or death, with five out of 576 patients in the Paxlovid group and 10 out of 569 in the placebo group necessitating hospitalization or passing away. Once more, the outcomes lacked statistical significance.
According to the manufacturer, there was just one death in the placebo group whereas there were none among the patients who took Paxlovid.
People who had received all of their vaccinations and had at least one risk factor for developing severe COVID-19 were initially included in the EPIC-SR investigation; however, after Paxlovid was approved for the cohort in December 2021, this cohort was no longer included in the study. Pfizer then changed its research eligibility requirements to permit participants whose most recent vaccination was 12 months or more ago.
There was a 57 percent risk reduction for hospitalization or death, with three out of 361 in the Paxlovid group and seven out of 360 in the placebo group requiring to be hospitalized or passing away, according to a sub-group analysis of 721 vaccinated individuals with at least one risk factor for progression to severe COVID-19. Pfizer reported that the results were not statistically significant.
Additionally, Paxlovid exhibited a non-significant 62 percent daily reduction in COVID-19-related medical visits across all patients as compared to placebo.
According to a statement from Pfizer’s CEO and chairman, Albert Bourla, the company’s preliminary research findings “support the efficacy and safety profile for PAXLOVID in the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients with at least one risk factor for progressing to severe COVID-19, regardless of vaccination status.”
“With up to 40–50 [percent] of people around the world estimated to be high risk, we believe there remains a significant unmet need for treatment options to help combat this disease, and we will continue to prioritize efforts to advance the development of PAXLOVID,” he added.
Paxlovid decreases COVID-19 hospitalization and mortality by 46%, according to data from a retrospective cohort study conducted in Israel in early June among a highly immunized community. The study said the drug was “more effective in older patients, immunosuppressed patients, and patients with underlying neurological or cardiovascular disease.”
The antiviral medication Paxlovid was not successful in avoiding symptomatic COVID-19 infection in household contacts of the COVID-19 patient who took the tablet, according to a second study in which it failed to yield a statistically significant outcome. Pfizer made this announcement in April.
The United States ended up spending more than $10 billion to purchase 20 million courses of Paxlovid from Pfizer, and the White House has been requesting additional funding from Congress to sustain the purchase of additional courses of the antiviral medication, as well as other treatments and booster doses of vaccines.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a warning in late May that a few individuals taking Paxlovid may encounter a rebound in COVID-19 symptoms, which means they may experience symptoms again after their symptoms have subsided or test positive for COVID-19 after testing negative.
When the rebound occurred, the CDC stated that it might not have been caused by the medication and that it “may be part of the natural history of SARS-CoV-2” in certain individuals, “independent of treatment with Paxlovid and regardless of vaccination status.”
GreatGameIndia is being actively targeted by powerful forces who do not wish us to survive. Your contribution, however small help us keep afloat. We accept voluntary payment for the content available for free on this website via UPI, PayPal and Bitcoin.
Will America-First News Outlets Make it to 2023?
Things are looking grim for conservative and populist news sites.
There’s something happening behind the scenes at several popular conservative news outlets. 2021 was bad, but 2022 is proving to be disastrous for news sites that aren’t “playing ball” with the corporate media narrative. It’s being said that advertisers are cracking down, forcing some of the biggest ad networks like Google and Yahoo to pull their inventory from conservative outlets. This has had two major effects. First, it has cooled most conservative outlets from discussing “taboo” topics like Pandemic Panic Theater, voter fraud, or The Great Reset. Second, it has isolated those ad networks that aren’t playing ball.
Certain topics are anathema for most ad networks. Speaking out against vaccines or vaccine mandates is a certain path to being demonetized. Highlighting voter fraud in the 2020 and future elections is another instant advertising death penalty. Throw in truthful stories about climate change hysteria, Critical Race Theory, and the border crisis and it’s easy to understand how difficult it is for America-First news outlets to spread the facts, share conservative opinions, and still pay the bills.
Without naming names, I have been told of several news outlets who have been forced to either consolidate with larger organizations or who have backed down on covering certain topics out of fear of being “canceled” by the ad networks. I get it. This is a business for many of us and it’s not very profitable. Those of us who do this for a living are often barely squeaking by, so loss of additional revenue can often mean being forced to make cuts. That means not being able to cover the topics properly. Its a Catch-22: Tell the truth and lose the money necessary to keep telling the truth, or avoid the truth and make enough money to survive. Those who have chosen survival simply aren’t able to spread the truth properly.
We will never avoid the truth. The Lord will provide if it is His will. Our job is simply to share the facts, spread the Gospel, and educate as many Americans as possible while exposing the forces of evil.
To those who have the means, we ask that you please donate. We have options available now, but there is no telling when those options will cancel us. We just launched a new GiveSendGo page. We also have our GivingFuel page. There have been many who have been canceled by PayPal, but for now it’s still an option. Your generosity is what keeps these sites running and allows us to get the truth to the masses. We’ve had great success in growing but we know we can do more with your assistance.
Thank you, and God Bless!